Objectivity

According to laughing boy at LGF, the Washington Post has caved in to the radical left, the anti-war movement and all the other boogeymen LGF'ers have nightmares about. The story is
here.

The newspaper notified the Department of Defense that it would no longer donate public service advertising space to help promote the Freedom Walk, an event planned for Sept. 11. At the conclusion of the procession from the Pentagon to the Mall, there will be a performance by country star Clint Black, who recorded the song “I Raq and Roll.”

“As it appears that this event could become politicized, The Post has decided to honor the Washington area victims of 9/11 by making a contribution directly to the Pentagon Memorial Fund,” said Eric Grant, a Post spokesman. “It is The Post’s practice to avoid activities that might lead readers to question the objectivity of The Post’s news coverage.”

The Pentagon expressed disappointment. “It’s unfortunate that The Washington Post has made this decision not to support the Freedom Walk,” said Allison Barber, deputy assistant secretary of defense for communications. “But we do welcome their donation to the Pentagon fund.”

Other media co-sponsors of the event are WTOP Radio, WJLA television and NewsChannel8. Officials with those outlets were out of the office and could not be reached late yesterday.

Pentagon officials have maintained that the event is intended to be a non-political homage to the victims and a salute to veterans past and present, devoid of commentary on the merits of the war in Iraq. The Post’s corporate officials emphasized that distinction after its involvement was the subject of a Post story Friday. But The Post’s participation was criticized by members of the antiwar movement and by journalists in the paper’s own newsroom who posted messages on an internal electronic discussion board. These critics said the co-sponsorship could hurt the paper’s credibility in covering the war and antiwar demonstrations.

“Post news employees are subject to disciplinary action for participating in political activities that may be perceived as revelatory of personal opinions or bias,” said a resolution passed earlier yesterday by the leadership of The Post unit of the Washington-Baltimore Newspaper Guild. “The Washington Post itself should be held to the same high standard. . . . The Guild supports The Post’s stated intention of honoring the nation’s veterans, including those who have served in Iraq. But the Post undermines this goal by lending its support to a political event that links the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks to the war in Iraq — a link that The Post, in its reporting, has shown to be false.”

The truth is that the paper realised that co-sponsoring a government organised event was likely to damage their objectivity and credibility, not just with the anti-war movement but with their readership, other news organisations and their own staff.