Little Green Footballs

Loading...

Friday, October 12, 2007

Charles (indirectly) endorses murderous racists

Charles Johnson should know he's playing with fire every time he tries to smear someone by pronouncing them guilty through association (his latest example is particularly ridiculous as it's actually a completely one-way relationship he's highlighting).

If Charles is going to take that line then perhaps he'd better get his house in order first. You see, the other day a teenager in Belgium was found guilty of double murder. The teenager was the son of a Vlaams Blok founder and Vlaams Belang politician - both parties endorsed by Charles.

So, by CJ's own logic, he's endorsing racist murderers and their ideological (and biological) parents. Nice!

Posted by X at 07:26

Labels: ,

14 comments:

Anonymous said...

Sorry, you article makes no sense, neither the links. and I would say that is smearing claiming he endorsing murderers? and the google search you provided shows the Islamists threst. so are you saying they were justified in their attacks on "racist" party? this is more trouble if you apply your logic that you applied to LGF. not that i m defending them, but that's reality.

10/12/2007 11:08:00 AM
Bobby Dazzler said...

Get a dictionary. Look up the word 'indirectly'. Then read the links. Then you may understand. If not pick up the dictionary again and look up the word 'idiot'. It'll be the one with your picture next to it.

10/12/2007 11:29:00 AM
The Sphinx said...

If one is guilty through association, then Chuckles should be incarcerated for a long time.

A bit off topic here, but Al Gore was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize for his efforts against global warming. This will be the happiest day at LGF for sure, ever.

10/12/2007 03:27:00 PM
Anonymous said...

What Charles doesn't want you to know is that Stormfront regularly link to him as well. The pro-Israel sentiment is controversial among the Stormfronters, but the two sites do share much the same views on every other race. ;)

LGF's on a list of "Fine blogs about Islam":

http://www.stormfront.org/forum/showthread.php/some-fine-blogs-islam-249117.html

LGF's own brand of copy pasta is read by Stormfronters:

http://www.stormfront.org/forum/showthread.php/uk-tv-airs-shock-undercover-356034.html

"For people who speak good English, Fjordman's blog and Brussels Journal are pretty good. Unfortunately Fjordman has stopped writing.
Fjordman hasn't stopped writing, as far as I know. He puts together excellent updates with tons of links on both The Brussels Journal and The Gates of Vienna. I see him sometimes comments on Little Green Footballs, but that place is crawling with Zionist cheerleaders, mostly of US and UK, making sure the discussion doesn't stray from 'the agenda'."

http://www.stormfront.org/forum/showthread.php/kansallissosialismi-com-297288p4.html

etc...

10/12/2007 10:03:00 PM
Anonymous said...

mj said "look up the word 'idiot'. It'll be the one with your picture next to it." . well speaking of idiocy, I don't call your argument at all a smart thing. not you just even direct a comment that wasn't even harmful to the writer to a personal attack, while I m even anonymously writing, which proves more or less how bizarre is your logic. so let's stay away from personal attacks.

As for the article, again, directly or indirectly , I don't see any relation and any endorsement. and I think LGF right about Islamist threat, they are there, they speak for themselves. what is not right about LGF is focusing on that issue where there are another threats and issues, or when not mentioning some more truth, or when closing comments to members.

hopefully you don't base your whole life on dictionaries. you might end up in trouble, imagine mj in a bar, and catching his dictionary all the time.

10/13/2007 11:36:00 AM
Bobby Dazzler said...

Jeezus!

Let me explain to you in simpler language.

1. Charles Johnson uses guilt by association to smear someone.

2. A teenager was murdered in Belgium with links to a right wing hate party.

3. Charles Johnson has endorsed, supported and given publicity to Vlaams Belang and their apologists/enablers like Paul Belien at Brussels Journal.

4. By Charles standards that should mean that he indirectly endorses murderous racists.

As for the questions of personal attacks? You're still an idiot.

10/13/2007 12:04:00 PM
Anonymous said...

To be perfectly fair, liberal democrats have been pushing the same attack on Ron Paul.

Orcinus has been pushing the Ron Paul must be a Nazi because Stormfront's endorsed him line for a while.

Jesus's General is less vehement but he takes a similar line.

Ron Paul's an asshole but there's still something appealing about someone who pisses off pompous and clueless pwoggie dems and LGF neocons.

10/14/2007 07:17:00 AM
Anonymous said...

#40 Charles 10/13/07 8:50:33 pm

re: {{#33 WhiteRasta

{{Charles,

{{If someone is banned, can they still come here and view the threads?}}

I usually don't make the effort to block someone completely from viewing LGF. But with jakester I made an exception.

Translation: "I still haven't figured out a way to block dynamic IP addresses."

10/14/2007 09:14:00 AM
Anonymous said...

Wow, MJ, you're just a kettle full of the milk of human kindness. Of course, it's always the "other" guy who's violent and bigoted, never ourselves, and all things are justified in stamping him out.

10/14/2007 04:42:00 PM
Bobby Dazzler said...

Wow, MJ, you're just a kettle full of the milk of human kindness.

Where did I claim otherwise?

Of course, it's always the "other" guy who's violent and bigoted, never ourselves, and all things are justified in stamping him out.

Where did I claim any of that? Sounds like projection to me.

...oh and what the hell has either of those sentences got to do with the post at hand?

10/14/2007 10:06:00 PM
Anonymous said...

ok, Mj we had enough from you, do you think you are smart by calling others idiots? I guess you should check out a nearby hospital to see if something penetrated your brain from the ear side. Not to mention, is MJ standing for MuJahid? or Muslim Jihadi? just wondering.

here is the reply, many people does exactly like LGF, read around in blogs, read daily kos, read blogs on left and on right. while I disagree with his own way, we must not apply his logic, look the title of this article very misguiding, yes the author talking about "LGF own logic" but there is something makes no sense, I don't see there is any endorsement, and I don't see where is the smearing? is it smearing because he mentioned racist group hearting Ron Paul? smearing Paul or the racists?

When I come commenting here, I would like to see LGFWatch focus on the wrong things mostly more than writing in similar way.

finally, MJ I know all that does not have any meaning to you, since your brain is full of hate craps, and some bitching around. but make sure to hospitalize yourself before you gonna be branded harmful for self and others.

oh, is MJ means Mentally Jolted?

10/15/2007 09:37:00 AM
The Sphinx said...

For some people the simplest issues can be rocket science, if they're programmed to think in one direction only.
MJ = Muslim Jihadist.. Wow, how freaking original.

Speaking about robots:

#75 eff plus

"For me, my main issue in this election is fighting Islamic fascism. Everything else is secondary. (..)"


Yeah you know, screw the education, health care, security, economy, environment, and resources, we're busy fighting an ethereal enemy here..

10/15/2007 01:32:00 PM
Anonymous said...

Ok, my english is a second language. so how stupid are you not to know that? if you pick a second language you can learn how hard to speak like native.

2-You didn't argue, it is all swearing and personal attacks from the first reply to my posts. you think you are smart? and you criticizing LGF but you do the worst?

excuse me, did u see smearing Paul? just because mentioning the inside jobs nuts and racists endorsing him? excuse me this is typical in politics both sides do that.

You protest others to critcize Islam and radical Islame. while you take freedom to attack any other relgion.

what I mentioned about MJ and all other words to mock you, that's because you started that way, so if you think this is idiocy, you're talking about yourself.

you are too stupid with time at hand, so instead of doing your own blog . you waste timing watching another blog? how stupid are you then? how about making LGFWATCHWATCH?

when I came here, I thought I m going to have some debate with this desperate guy, but obviously your way of talking is excellent in deterring anyone who comes here. I m not going to see your Frog. you are stupid to get it, but you call others idiots.

thanks MuJahid. for posting our comments, but wait a second, you barely get some comments and traffic, even several haters link to you.

10/17/2007 09:15:00 AM
Bobby Dazzler said...

Ok, my english is a second language. so how stupid are you not to know that? if you pick a second language you can learn how hard to speak like native.

As I don't know you personally and I'm certainly not psychic how would I know that? Many English speakers have an awkward writing style.

2-You didn't argue, it is all swearing and personal attacks from the first reply to my posts. you think you are smart? and you criticizing LGF but you do the worst?

Actually first post instructed you on how to logically understand the post and then suggested if you still didn't understand you might be an idiot. If you think that's as bad as racism, homophobia, calls for the death of civilians, defence of torture...etc...etc...displayed at LGF then you need to re-think your world outlook.

excuse me, did u see smearing Paul? just because mentioning the inside jobs nuts and racists endorsing him? excuse me this is typical in politics both sides do that.

No, but I never claimed you did. The claim was that Charles Johsnon was promoting this smear.

You protest others to critcize Islam and radical Islame. while you take freedom to attack any other relgion.

No, criticise by all means. But the 'nuke mecca' rubbish that comes out of LGF is not reasoned debate it's ugly bigotry. Point out where I have attacked any other religion?

what I mentioned about MJ and all other words to mock you, that's because you started that way, so if you think this is idiocy, you're talking about yourself.

Maybe, but your first instinct was to draw parallels with Muslim terrorists because I didn't agree with you. There's a difference between suggesting someone may be an idiot and someone being a Muslim terrorist because they disagree with you.

you are too stupid with time at hand, so instead of doing your own blog . you waste timing watching another blog? how stupid are you then? how about making LGFWATCHWATCH?

I have another blog. There is already an LGFWW. Stupid, is spending time digging yourself further into a hole whilst making an idiot of yourself. Sound familiar?

when I came here, I thought I m going to have some debate with this desperate guy, but obviously your way of talking is excellent in deterring anyone who comes here. I m not going to see your Frog. you are stupid to get it, but you call others idiots.

1. People like you have no interest in debate.You've proved that with your idiotic rambling.

2. What frog?

thanks MuJahid. for posting our comments, but wait a second, you barely get some comments and traffic, even several haters link to you.

Again with the Muslim terrorist slur, if someone disagrees with you can only respond as a bigot.

Traffic isn't everything. The message that bigotry won't go unanswered is.

As for 'haters' linking....read up on 'guilt by association' as a logical fallacy here

http://www.nizkor.org/features/fallacies/guilt-by-association.html

10/17/2007 10:00:00 AM

Post a Comment