Girlieman points out that a new disclaimer has crept onto LGF recently, which reads:
"Comments are open and unmoderated, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Little Green Footballs. Obscene, abusive, silly, or annoying remarks may be deleted, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their views by Little Green Footballs."
To which Girlieman remarks:
New or not, it's bullshit. Charles deletes posts he disagrees with (and bans the poster) but allows vile hate filled posts that serve no purpose whatsoever to remain. Draw your own conclusions about what the management does nor does not endorse. Like everywhere else, actions speak louder than words.
5 comments:
Give us eaxamples of posters he's banned because he disagreed with them.
about lgf's terror in the sky claim:
SUSPICIOUSLY similar to the debunked Urban Legend:
http://www.snopes.com/politics/crime/skyterror.asp
That disclaimer isn't anything new. They changed it after this FDL post debunked the old bullshit one.
Literally, hours after that post came up, Charles changed it.
For supposed stalkers, you guys haven't been on the ball too long eh? :P
'New LGF disclaimer'? Hmm, I've been reading LGF for over a year and the disclaimer has always been the same...
Why post old information like it is 'hot off the presses'?
Maybe instead of calling for ex-LGFers to comment on the site you should read it for yourself?
I think he's switched coffee brands.
Get on it, this is BIG.
Post a Comment