Compare and contrast

Charles Johnson has written a lot about the case of former CNN journalist Eason Jordan, but most of it comes loaded with the assumption that Jordan DID say what Charles claims he did, and that the story is one of 'why didn't Jordan resign earlier' and 'aren't the MSM a bunch of lying bastards'. Compare this with Jesurgislac's Livejournal entry: Eason Jordan: what's the real scandal?