interesting, how since Chuck's favorite complaint against those who uphold Dan Rather's use of the questioned medical documents (which in an overblown sense they call 'Rathergate') is that they describe the documents as “Fake but accurate” - that he goes to argue that the photo may actually be a still from a Dutch movie, but it represents a real event, and should be taken seriously... please point out the 'distinction without a difference'...
1 comment:
interesting, how since Chuck's favorite complaint against those who uphold Dan Rather's use of the questioned medical documents (which in an overblown sense they call 'Rathergate') is that they describe the documents as “Fake but accurate” - that he goes to argue that the photo may actually be a still from a Dutch movie, but it represents a real event, and should be taken seriously... please point out the 'distinction without a difference'...
Post a Comment